Recessions, bear markets, and bananas

25 June 2022

reading time:  minutes

We may be in recession territory. Stats NZ recently stated that growth in GPD for the March 2022 quarter was negative, and “recession” is commonly defined as two consecutive quarters of falling GDP.

When I look at Google Trends, it tells me that more Kiwis are searching for the term than usual:

Oh no!

Recessions and bananas

Whenever I hear the word “recession”, I’m reminded of Alfred Kahn, who worked in Jimmy Carter’s administration. When told not to use the word, he started referring to recessions as “bananas”.

Before the word recession was in common use, the word “depression” was used more often. “Depression”, in turn, was adopted because it was softer than “panic” and “crisis”.

The words we use to describe economic events are important. As another example, in the past week or so I’ve seen the housing market described as a “bloodbath” (which is rubbish; QV’s May 2022 House Price Index shows that despite the last few months seeing a downturn, the median house price in New Zealand is substantially higher than it was 12 months ago, and very similar to what it was six months ago).

A recession is a recession is a recession?

We may be “halfway down the road to recession”, as one politician describes. But let’s put it into context.

Yes, quarterly GDP growth was negative for the quarter ending March 2022. But what really matters, in my opinion, is the size of that figure.

For the quarter to March 2022, GDP reduced by 0.2%.

For the year to March 2022, GDP rose by 5.1%.

If we have another quarter with GDP falling by 0.2% New Zealand will technically be in a recession.

But is that a big deal in the scheme of things?

If we experience a drop like we did in the June 2020 quarter (10.3%), then maybe it is. If GDP falls, or stays static, for a long period of time, then that is a bigger deal.

Two scenarios can share the same label but be very different in substance.

Some things to keep in mind

Downturns are associated with other things, like share prices falling. Various markets around the world are now being labelled as “bear markets”.

If you’re invested in shares (either directly or via a managed fund), remember that the value of your interest in these shares are a function of two variables:

  • How many shares you hold (ie, what proportion of the company you own); and
  • The price of those shares.

If the price of an individual share reduces, then the dollar figure related to your investment reduces.

However, keep the following in mind:

  • Of the two variables, you can’t control share prices. You can control the number of shares you hold. And this doesn’t change.
  • Your proportional interest in the company is unchanged. Whatever the share price in question, you have the same entitlement to the company’s future profitability (ie, dividends) as you did before the share price dropped.
  • In an ideal world, the value of a share represents the present value of its discounted future cash flows. This doesn’t just relate to the short-term, but the medium-, long-, and very-long term. If the value of a share reduces by 30%, this implies that the present value of all of its future cash flows have fallen by 30%. Which is pretty significant. It’s a bit like waving a wand and telling someone that the value of their future earnings (wages/salary) between now and when they retire are going to reduce by 30%. Most of the time, big downturns are overreactions. (Do I say this with enough confidence to start picking shares? No. Because the timing and extent of these overreactions are hard to predict.)
  • Think of assets in relative terms. During times of uncertainty, perhaps shares are more vulnerable to big swings in value than more defensive assets. But remember that shares represent interests in companies that tend to be large, profitable, professionally governed, with capital reserves. In the aggregate they’re very well adapted to surviving and thriving during times of uncertainty.

Step back, and think about the long-run

Earlier in this article I shared a Google Trends showing search trends for the word “recession” over the past 12 months.

I have a confession: I lied with statistics.

Relatively speaking, there has been an increase in searches relating to the term lately. But it’s nothing when we step back and contextualise search queries over a longer time frame:

If you’re invested in shares, you should be doing so with a long-term horizon in mind. If you invest in shares with a long-term horizon in mind, you should do so with the EXPECTATION that there will be downturns. Over the long-run, downturns aren’t just possibilities, or probabilities, but inevitabilities.

By the time you need to liquidate these shares they should have had time to recover. Even if you need to liquidate them and they haven’t recovered, it is unlikely that you will need to liquidate all shares at the same time. (In effect, most people “dollar cost average” twice – when accumulating wealth, by investing gradually over the course of their working lives, and also when they decumulate, by withdrawing investments gradually.)

I recently shared this chart, which shows inflation-adjusted GDP per capita in New Zealand since 1980 (when I was born). Real GDP has nearly doubled from $20,000 to $35,000 (in 2011 dollars) over this time.

Yes, there were times when GDP per capita fell or stayed static. But the long-run trajectory is pretty amazing.

Recessions, like inflation, don’t impact everyone equally

Inflation is reported as a single figure. For the March 2022 quarter, Stats NZ reported inflation as 6.9% compared with the year before. This was the largest movement in over 30 years.

This is based on the Consumers Price Index (CPI), which is calculated based on a specific basket of goods and services.

In case it’s not obvious, different households purchase different goods and services each year. This is especially pronounced when we think about people at different ages and stages, and people in different financial situations.

Ask a young couple who have been wanting to buy their first home about inflation, and it’s likely that their lived experience will be very different to the couple approaching retirement who has been living in their “forever home” for the past 15 years.

Similarly, the experience of a single person in their 20s might be very different to that of a couple in their 40s with young children. Or compare the experience of two people in their 50s, where one person is in a secure role earning hundreds of thousands of dollars (and has lots of debt secured against assets that appreciate in line with inflation) and the other is in less secure employment that doesn’t pay much more than minimum wage (with no significant assets/debt).

(Interestingly, Governments with high debt levels benefit from inflation. If you’re the nation’s largest borrower, and owe $50 billion, but inflation is higher than the interest/coupon you’re paying on that debt, then in a sense, inflation is eating away at the real value of this debt. That’s a win! The flip side, of course, is that Governments don’t like inflation because it reduces the likelihood that they’ll be re-elected.)

In the same way that inflation doesn’t impact everyone evenly, nor do recessions.

There are lots of people who thrive during recessions. Even if it might seem like they’re going backwards in the short-term, or in something resembling the doldrums, once the wind is that their back again they might often reap the rewards of the downturn much later.

On the other hand, recessions are often associated with higher rates of unemployment. Severe recessions might have really significant levels of unemployment. The ripple effects of unemployment, financial and otherwise, can be significant and enduring. At the same time, there is often reduced Government income and a balance that needs to be met between a certain austerity versus attempting to stimulate the economy.

In the short-term it can be hard to position oneself to be able to be resilient in the face of economic downturns, let alone thrive in uncertainty. From personal experience, all I can say is that it’s important to get through challenging periods and learn lessons. One of the lessons I have learnt is to dedicate time and energy over the long-run to becoming more resilient to inflation and recessions over time.

Predictions WILL be wrong

One of the reasons economists (for example, decision-makers within central banks) make predictions is to inform current decision-making, which inevitably influences the future. Ideally, if you predict a recession banana based on current trends, you will make steps to stop it from happening, or reducing its magnitude.

One way of thinking about it: a central bank’s job is to make its own dire predictions wrong.

There’s more to life than money

When Covid first hit, I remember being fairly sanguine about it. (Read my article from February 2020 and make your own assessment whether that’s actually the case!) My immediate concern wasn’t our family’s balance sheet. It was about our health, and the health of our loved ones, especially those who were most vulnerable to Covid.

(I also saw a lot of silver linings.)

The way I saw it, it was that this was just a chapter in the story of our lives. I thought it was quite likely that it would be a setback, and that it might mean my wife and I would need to work a little longer at the tail end of our professional lives. So long as we’re alive and in relatively good health, c’est la vie.

At the end of the day, we are only two or so years out from experiencing the start of a global pandemic! Some people have suffered, in myriad ways.

But it’s astonishing that many of us have got through as unscathed as we have.

If we have hard times ahead, then we have hard times ahead. To a large extent there’s not much that most of us can do about it. All we can do is make sure we’re playing “attack” and “defence” when it comes to making financial and lifestyle decisions, in the sense of aiming to achieve the things we want to achieve, and reducing the probability and impact of the things we don’t want to happen.

One of the worst things we can do is let labels such as “recession” or “bear market” scare us, without thinking through what they actually mean to us. Not all recessions or bear markets are the same.

Next time you hear a scary term, think of whether it feels quite as scary if you use the label “banana”. Or “apple” or “orange”.


Tags

bananas, bear markets, bull markets, labels, recession, recessions


About the author 

Sonnie Bailey

Sonnie likes telling people that he’s a former Olympic power walker, a lion tamer, or a popular author of erotic, supernatural, mystery novellas. Sometimes he says he was in a band that opened for Robbie Williams. None of these are true.

Other articles you may like:

“Market cap” can be misleading
Shares and hurricanes
Every asset class has bad years, even bonds
The future is going to be wild
The 4% rule is a mind-killer
Investing in social capital